To fee or not to fee?

Bad headline aside, the question of whether to charge for school bus service has been generating a lot of contention recently.

As we report on pg. 11 in our September issue, two Indiana districts dropped their bus rider fees after state Attorney General Gregory Zoeller deemed such fees "unconstitutional."

"The legislature has identified transportation of school children as a part of what would constitute a uniform system of public education in Indiana," Zoeller wrote in an opinion piece. School districts do not have "the specific authority to assess, charge, or collect a school bus rider fee from the students," he added.

Franklin Township Community School Corp. had planned to start charging $75 per student for riding the bus. Lake Central School Corp. had been charging $10 per student for the past two years. Following the release of Zoeller's opinion, both districts rescinded their fees.

Here are some other recent developments on the fee front:

• At Lodi (Calif.) Unified School District, a large budget deficit led to a plan to charge $360 per student to ride the school bus for a year.

But based on input from within the district and the public — as well as the fact that only one bus pass had been bought — the superintendent decided to postpone the fee program. The board of education will revisit the idea later in the year to possibly try it again for the 2011-12 school year.

For now, the district opted to consolidate routes by picking students up at designated hubs instead of their homes. The hub system is expected to save more than $550,000 per year.

• In Hinsdale, Ill., the Community Consolidated School District 181 voted earlier this year to increase its minimum distance for free bus service from one mile to 1.5 miles. The plan was to charge riders who live less than 1.5 miles from school.

But after many parents objected to the change, the school board decided to revert to its previous policy. The district then said it would look at consolidating bus routes to help fill its transportation budget gap.

It's not surprising that parents would push back when informed that they'll have to pay for their kids to ride the school bus. What is surprising is Zoeller's opinion in Indiana.

While I can't speak to the technicalities of what may or may not make school bus fees "unconstitutional" in that state, it seems counterintuitive to deter districts from using fees to try to keep their bus programs running. If a district can't afford to continue providing free rides and has to cut transportation (except for special-needs students), no one wins.

That's what just happened at Oceanside (Calif.) Unified School District. Its board voted to eliminate general-education elementary bus service, a move that impacts about 1,500 students.

The North County Times reported that the district began charging $360 per student last year, but less than half of the expected revenue came in, mainly because of the high number of students from low-income families qualifying for free transportation.

School busing should be offered for free as much as possible. But when budget shortfalls abound, it's a service that's well worth a dollar a ride.

— Thomas McMahon, Executive Editor
Print | posted on Monday, August 30, 2010 10:04 AM

Comments

 re: To fee or not to fee?

left by Ron Kinney at 8/30/2010 12:03 PM
Tom,

School busing has never been free. However, because transportation is so closely associated with education, e.g., a related service for special need students, most regular and special ed. parents view transportation as an integral part of the educational process. In states where home to school transportation is mandated it would seem inappropriate to charge parents for a service that is mandated by the state. In states where regular ed. home to school transportation is not mandated, like California, you have laws that regulate who can and can not be charged for home to school transportation. For example, you can not charge low income families or families with special needs pupils that have transportation specified in an IEP. To me, this issue raises a bigger question, why is home to school transportation not mandated and free for all pupils? Aren’t we discriminating against pupils? If transportation is indeed an integral part of education, why don’t all eligible pupils have equal access? Perhaps this will be settled in the courts...

 re: To fee or not to fee?

left by Ron Chew at 8/30/2010 6:28 PM
I am not sure about other states but I think there are still some other options that need to be addressed before school systems begin "pay to transport fees" . In Indiana many school systems currently order unnecessary options on school buses that really have nothing to do with the safety of the passengers such as "white roofs, luggage compartments, air ride & air brake , etc. and transportation facilities that are quite extravagant. With the current financial situation we need to go back to basics for transportation needs.

 re: To fee or not to fee?

left by Bill Reinke at 8/31/2010 5:53 AM
White roofs reduce inside temps for safety of students, luggage compartments remove oversize items so kids do not get hurt, air brakes lines do not rust and offer better stopping, air ride is less jarring ride than springs for comfort of students and allow the bus to last longer. Most transportation departments spec a bus to gain a longer life and to get the most for their money with smaller budgets. I believe fees are tring to be charged so boards can balance the budget. I do not like the myself.

 re: To fee or not to fee?

left by Charlie Hood at 9/16/2010 9:11 AM
Tom- I've been hesitant to respond, because this gets to the heart of what is really a philosophical and political issue; i.e., should public education be a duty of the states that's "free" in the sense of being a shared responsibility supported by taxes, not individual user fees? My belief is that it should. Florida's constitution requires a free system of public education as a paramount duty of the state. That model has served our state and most of our country well for over a century. While our system is far from perfect, equal access to education, regardless of means, is at the heart of our success as a nation.

I'm concerned that charging fees to compensate for cutbacks in transportation to educational programs is a patch that stratifies educational opportunity. We know maintaining educational programs and service levels is very tough these days, budgetarily, but school bus transportation is an integral component of education and must remain available for students who live far enough from their assigned schools to require it. We need to keep encouraging efficiency, but transportation should not be uniquely on the chopping block to begin with, and it should not be avaiable only to those families who can afford it. Thanks for raising an interesting topic.

Charlie

 re: To fee or not to fee?

left by Vicki at 11/13/2010 4:19 PM
In Hawaii, students pay to ride. We almost lost transportation altogether just this previous year. I believe that transportation is just as important to the education and safety of the student as is the school that the child is educated in. Will they start charging for the use of the facilities, curriculum, and teachers to those who are not eligible for the "free" or discounted fare?

Add A Comment

Title   
Name 
Email (never displayed) 
Url 
Comments   
Please add 8 and 8 and type the answer here: