Help cut summer overload

“How was your summer?”

For many of you in pupil transportation, the answer is “busy” or “very busy.”

Even when schools aren’t in session, there’s plenty to do at the bus yard: planning and adjusting routes, recruiting and training drivers, maintenance work, bus rider registrations for the coming school year, etc.

Another activity that adds to the summer busyness is taking delivery of new buses. By one estimate, close to two-thirds of school buses are ordered for summer delivery.

In other words, more than 60% of school bus production is tied to deliveries that will occur during about 25% of the year.

Why is that? And is it in the industry’s best interest?

Hectic season
One key factor in the summer delivery rush is that most school districts are on a July 1 to June 30 fiscal year, so the funding for bus purchases becomes available in July.

For contractors, they may not want new buses on the books until after July because the buses won’t generate revenue until they’re transporting kids.

Some operations may have other reasons for ordering their buses for summer delivery, but let’s consider the challenges that this presents on the manufacturing side.

With such sharp peaks in demand each year, the manufacturers have some extremely busy months of bus building.

To ramp up production, the OEMs often have to hire a substantial number of temporary workers, who may be limited in experience and will need to be brought up to speed on the processes involved.

As an example of how the manufacturers try to mitigate this issue, they typically provide incentives for dealers to give them orders for late summer, fall and early winter, when production demand is at its lowest.

Off-peak delivery also reduces stress on the industry’s component suppliers as well as the dealers, and it can benefit the buyers — the school districts and contractors.

The more the OEMs can level out their production throughout the year, the more they can retain an experienced workforce. And that helps in optimizing quality, meaning a better bus for the customer.

Avoid business as usual
So how can school districts and contractors take advantage of off-peak delivery?

For some, it could be a matter of changing their budgeting process. Contractors may have more flexibility than school districts in when they can pay for new buses.

Another option is financing. In addition to making off-peak delivery more feasible, financing can enable school bus operations to replace vehicles more frequently — perhaps every year instead of every two or three years. Financing also allows the buyer to avoid huge capital purchases.

In the school bus industry, there can be no more “business as usual.” Off-peak delivery may be a big shift from how things have been done in the past, but it has the potential to benefit everyone.

One more example: It can help the OEMs improve their bottom line, which means they can invest more in research and development. And that will lead to an even safer ride for students.

— Frank Di Giacomo, VP, bus and rail/publisher

Print | posted on Friday, August 10, 2012 5:47 PM

Comments

 re: Help cut summer overload

left by Dan Luttrell at 8/14/2012 1:15 PM
I think more school systems would be open to a structured delivery target month delivery system. Instead of promising a summer delivery promise a specific month delivery according to when they prefer to cut payment checks through their business office and school board arrangements. At least the school systems that CAN wait can make arrangements to delay deliveries and that would afford the manufacturers a more organized time frame to build such buses according to monthly delivery target dates. If the school system is on a 10 year replacement plan - the money has already been set aside. It is available. The school system can take advantage of gaining interest on their money while waiting for a later delivery. Those that can't wait should be willing to pay a little extra for a summer delivery plan date if they have such a need. I'm just saying - spread it out and retain experienced workers all year round for all year round delivery planning. What would be wrong with that? Dan - Indiana

 re: Help cut summer overload

left by Charlie Hood at 8/16/2012 9:00 AM
Excellent points, Frank. Some states (including ours) have been taking advantage of this approach for years, scheduling bus bid timelines to afford flexibility for when buses are built. One key is to allow a long enough window of time from order to delivery (we allow 240 days) and to have an ordering window that is open throughout the year if possible. And your point should not be overlooked that it really helps OEMs to ensure a quality build when purchasers afford them the opportunity to employ the services of experienced, year-round assembly workers.

On a related front, we have been working hard to make our state bus specifications more "standard" and national in scope. Some customization of equipment is important to states and customers, but too much "variety" and too many special options can really work against build quality, while driving up cost. Buses have gotten complex, and we've become used to being able to spec our buses like we want, in most cases for good reasons. It's always a balance, though, and we've been working to scale back a bit on special "Florida" items to reduce the cost of our buses, without sacrificing safety, while improving build quality. School buses will always be a niche industry at only 30,000 units or so per year, but this idea of standardizing more and reducing special options is triggering more and more healthy debate in today's world of less money and fewer buses being bought.

Add A Comment

Title   
Name 
Email (never displayed) 
Url 
Comments   
Please add 2 and 7 and type the answer here: